Levy of penalty under Section 72(2) of KVAT Act - Wrong ...

VAT and Sales Tax

March 22, 2021

Levy of penalty under Section 72(2) of KVAT Act - Wrong classification of goods - it is evident that the levy of penalty under Section 72(2) of the Act is neither automatic nor mandatory. - the condition precedent for invoking the powers under Section 64 of the Act, is not fulfilled. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty under Section 72(2) of KVAT Act - Wrong ...

VAT and Sales Tax

March 22, 2021

You may also like:

Levy of penalty under section 72(2) of the KVAT Act 2003 - there is no understatement of tax liability made by the assessee, the same are disclosed in the returns to...

Whether levy of penalty u/S 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is automatic – Imposition of penalty is not automatic. - HC

Penalty under the provisions of Section 117 read with Section 72 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Non clearance of the goods from the warehouse within one year - penalty reduced - AT

Classification of 'Electronic Automatic Regulators' - in view of the Notification issued by the Central Government, the goods, namely Electronic Automatic Regulators...

Penalty - Confiscation of the goods – Merely because the appellant had claimed a wrong classification, it cannot be held that the appellant has mis-declared the goods - AT

Levy of penalty under Section 53(12)(a)(i) of the KVAT Act - The levy of penalty is not automatic, but is discretionary in nature. Therefore, the matters which have a...

Export of the goods - claim of duty drawback - Mere allegation of wrong classification without proving intentional mala fide cannot lead to imposition of penalty - CGOVT

KVAT Act - importer - there is absolutely nothing wrong for having collected and remitted the tax, without having any registration under the CST Act. - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - furnished wrong particulars of its income in terms of profits u/s 115JB - Computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 78 - entire facts were available on record and on this there is no dispute; nor is there any contrary finding by the adjudicating authority. The...

Quick Updates: