Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2021 Year 2021 This

TP Adjustment - Disallowance on professional fee u/s 40A(2) and ...


Assessing Officer misapplies Section 40A(2), contradicts TPO's arm's length findings on professional fee expense disallowance.

April 20, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

TP Adjustment - Disallowance on professional fee u/s 40A(2) and alternatively u/s 37 - the A.O. has erred in invoking the provisions of section 40A(2) of the I.T.Act to disallow the claim of expense as excessive and not legitimate to the business needs, especially in view of the fact that the TPO, in its transfer pricing orders for assessment years 2008-2009 and 2010-2011, had held the impugned transaction at arms length. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case pertains to the levy of penalty u/s 271G for failure to furnish documents and information u/ss 92CA/92D. The key points are: The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)...

  2. Income Tax: TPO empowered to determine arm's length price for specified domestic transactions not referred by Assessing Officer or reported in audit report. Sections...

  3. The ITAT held that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) should consider comparables dealing in electronic products only, supported by a technical expert's certificate,...

  4. ITAT ruled that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) improperly determined Arm's Length Price (ALP) without following prescribed methods under Rule 10B. The TPO merely...

  5. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh adjudication....

  6. TPA - the jurisdiction and power of TPO is to determine arm's length price of Royalty and the order of TPO holding that the assessee had not derived any benefit under...

  7. If the Transfer Pricing Officer did not agree to the arm's length price shown by the assessee it was open for him to determine the arm's length price by applying one of...

  8. Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to provide findings for rejecting assessee's claim of exemption as a startup from applicability of section...

  9. Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

  10. Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered a case involving Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment where the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) determined the Arm's Length Price...

  12. TP Adjustment - valuation of Arms Length Price (ALP) - No Arm's Length Price is required to be determined for a transaction with specified persons in section 40A(2)(b)...

  13. TP Adjustment - determination of Arm's Length Price - intra group services transactions as Cross-charges - Documents submitted by the assessee do not conclusively...

  14. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL)...

  15. ITAT adjudicated two primary issues: (1) International transaction involving Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC) and (2) Deduction under Section 80G for charitable donation....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates