Oppression and mismanagement - The complete exclusion of the ...

Court Finds Board Exclusion Unjust; Removal of Petitioner Directors is Oppression and Mismanagement; Prima Facie Case for Relief.

May 13, 2021

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

Oppression and mismanagement - The complete exclusion of the petitioner group from the board cannot be justified merely by pointing out that the meeting is a validly convened meeting, that the resolutions were duly approved and therefore the court should not intervene. There is no gainsaying that the principles of equity have been greatly disturbed by the act of the respondent group in removing all the three directors of the petitioner group and assuming 100% control of the board. The petitioners have made out a prima facie case for grant of the interim reliefs. - Tri

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and mismanagement - The complete exclusion of the ...

Court Finds Board Exclusion Unjust; Removal of Petitioner Directors is Oppression and Mismanagement; Prima Facie Case for Relief.

May 13, 2021

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

You may also like:

Oppression and mismanagement - misappropriation of funds - as such no irregularities were found in convening an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting which was requisitioned at...

NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the NCLT's discretionary waiver of eligibility criteria under Section 244(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal considered...

Oppression and mismanagement - not permitted/given sufficient opportunity to be involved in the affairs/board meetings - allotment of shares at par without premium to...

Oppression and mismanagement - Holding BOD meetings outside India - Nothing is shown that there is any restriction on the place where Board of Directors should hold...

The NCLAT upheld the NCLT's decision to refuse waiver u/ss 244(1)(a) and (b) of the Companies Act 2013 to the Appellants, who held only 5.83% shareholding, to file an...

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

Oppression and Mismanagement - allotment of shares - continuation as additional (3rd) director after 26.9.2010 is not as per law as was not regularised in AGM - Board...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

The Tribunal has the authority to order the purchase of shares by the company from any member u/s 242(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013, in cases of oppression and...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Allegations of financial mismanagement and irregularities by the promoters/directors - The High court acknowledged that despite the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - illegal allotment of shares - the allegations that there has been an illegal allotment of Petitioner's shares, exclusion of Petitioner...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Violation of the Status quo order - This Tribunal comes to a resultant conclusion that while passing of status quo order it should be...

Oppression and mismanagement - the Tribunal has the power to make Interim Orders which it thinks fit for regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company -...

Oppression and Mismanagement - This ‘Tribunal’ keeping in mind of the ingredients of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 comes to a resultant conclusion that...

Quick Updates: