Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2021 Year 2021 This

Revision u/s 263 - assumption of revisionary jurisdiction by ...


PCIT Challenges AO's Classification of NSEL Trading Income u/s 263; AO's Decision Deemed Accurate, Not Erroneous.

June 11, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - assumption of revisionary jurisdiction by PCIT - once the revenue has accepted the income from trading in commodity on NSEL as business income, then loss which arise from the NSEL trading cannot be termed as Speculation loss. Consequently, the view taken by the AO cannot the termed as erroneous. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

  2. Revision u/s 263 - another possible view of the matter - The appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the PCIT, arguing that the original assessment order by the AO was...

  3. The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO's assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. The unsigned assessment...

  4. Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

  5. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

  6. The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

  7. The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a...

  8. The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of an order passed u/s 143(3) by the Assessing Officer (AO), which was revised by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax...

  9. Validity of an ex-parte revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: The PCIT passed...

  10. The assessee borrowed loans from financial institutions at an interest rate of 12.75% and advanced loans to group companies or relatives at 12% interest rate. The...

  11. The ITAT Jaipur addressed a case involving a revision u/s 263 concerning the addition u/s 68 based on a report from an investigation in Mumbai. The PCIT contended that...

  12. The ITAT upheld the revision order u/s 263 The PCIT demonstrated that the Assessing Officer failed to examine/inquire/investigate transactions in the demat account, bank...

  13. ITAT upheld revision proceedings u/s 263 regarding undisclosed property transactions discovered during recovery proceedings. The assessee had failed to report capital...

  14. The crux of the case revolves around the applicability of Section 69A read with Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act on the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO)...

  15. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - All particulars were available before the PCIT in respect of such income and the PCIT upon being satisfied, accepted such declaration. Thus, if...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates