Revision u/s 263 - The revenue is disputing on non conduct of ...

Revenue's Challenge on Section 263 Fails as Assessee Firm Complies with Section 142(1) Notice, Assessment Decision Upheld.

June 15, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - The revenue is disputing on non conduct of enquiry, but we find the assessee firm has discharged its burden of proof on submitting the vital requisite details called for by the assessing officer by issue of statutory notice U/sec 142(1) of the Act along with the questioner which cannot be over looked. Since the information was available with the A.O in the course of the assessment, the A.O. has considered the facts, submissions and evidences filed and took a view. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - The revenue is disputing on non conduct of ...

Revenue's Challenge on Section 263 Fails as Assessee Firm Complies with Section 142(1) Notice, Assessment Decision Upheld.

June 15, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

The assessment u/s 143(1) was invalid as the procedure laid down u/s 144B was not followed. The case was selected for regular assessment, but the assessee was not given...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

Disallowance of interest u/s. 36(1)(iii) - partners of the assessee firm had over withdrawn an amount as in excess of what was brought by them in the firm - the assessee...

The ITAT held that the final assessment order under s.143(3) was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to issue a mandatory draft assessment order under s.144C(1) for...

Misappropriation of funds by an employee led to the assessee claiming expenses u/s 37(1) of the Act, which were later discovered to be embezzlement. The assessee...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - assessee failed to give reasons for non-compliance of statutory notice u/s. 142(1) - till the disposal of appeal by the CIT(A) the assessee...

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) and / or 272A(1)(d) - assessee failed to comply notice under Section 142(1) - The assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) and not under...

Validity of reopening of assessment - No statutory notice u/s 143(2) has been served - assessee failed to comply with the notice u/s 148 of the Act within the time...

Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

Quick Updates: