Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee wrongly claimed the income as ...

Income Tax

August 24, 2021

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee wrongly claimed the income as agricultural income - One of the strange features in the kind of arrangement or documentation of the assessee is that in case of no yield or damage of crop, the expenses on labour or service or fertilizer etc. has to be borne by the farmer because in absence of no crop, there would be no procurement price to the farmer and the farmer will get nothing. In such circumstances, how the assessee could explain that the cultivation has been done by the company. Another strange feature is that how the assessee can claim as cultivator as its name is not appearing in the revenue land records - penalty imposed by the AO upheld - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee wrongly claimed the income as ...

Income Tax

August 24, 2021

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – assessee has bonafide belief in making the claim that gain arising out of sale of agricultural land is exempt from tax - no penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - profits from sale and purchase of agricultural land shown as capital gain instead of profits and gains from business - No penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Adopting “Doctrine of continuity“ and concurrence, the penalty in the assessee's case is liable to be confirmed only in the first assessment year - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - penalty cannot be levied where a bonafide claim of the assessee was rejected by the tax department. - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act – assessee’s claim that no penalty is leviable when unproved income is offered for taxation to purchase peace is not at all sustainable - AT

Quick Updates: