Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2021 Year 2021 This

Demand of GST - Difference in GSTR 3B return - Violation of ...


GST Dispute: GSTR 3B Discrepancy Leads to Natural Justice Violation, Case Remanded for Further Review.

September 9, 2021

Case Laws     GST     HC

Demand of GST - Difference in GSTR 3B return - Violation of principles of natural justice - the petitioner applied for necessary information relating to the bills raised by him and TDS deducted thereon by the 3rd respondent, but the 3rd respondent has not furnished the said information in time and in the meanwhile, the impugned summary order was passed by the 2nd respondent - matter remanded back - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The court set aside the impugned order passed by the respondent u/s 73 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 2017, imposing a liability of Rs. 10.72 lakhs towards...

  2. Petitioner challenged the impugned order alleging violation of principles of natural justice, being unaware of the order and preceding notices, and discrepancy between...

  3. In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis....

  4. The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice as the petitioner did not respond to prior notices leading to the disputed order. Discrepancies...

  5. Challenge to an order issued under Form GST DRC-07 for the difference in tax amount between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. The impugned orders were passed without considering the...

  6. The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax...

  7. Judicial review of an assessment order was conducted due to discrepancies between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns. The petitioner's replies were not considered, violating...

  8. The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner's reply to the show cause notice was not considered. Discrepancies in GSTR returns were explained...

  9. The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be violative of principles of natural justice as it was a non-speaking order that failed to address the...

  10. HC held that adjudicating authority must consider GSTR-9 annual returns when evaluating Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims, rather than solely relying on discrepancies...

  11. The High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the notices were uploaded on the "view additional notices and orders" tab of the GST portal, and the...

  12. The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

  13. The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a fair chance to contest a tax demand due to a mismatch between GSTR 3B return and...

  14. Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

  15. The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates