Clandestine removal - Clinker - It is not for the respondent to ...

Burden of Proof on Revenue: No Evidence of Clinker Manufacturing, No Duty Imposed Due to Limestone Shortage Presumptions.

October 5, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal - Clinker - It is not for the respondent to show that they have not actually manufactured any final product out of this limestone found short. It is for the Revenue to, if a show cause notice is to be issued, to prove that the clinker was actually manufactured. In the present case, we find no such evidence coming forth. Therefore, even if it is held that the appellant has not satisfactorily explained its shortage of limestone, no duty can be demanded on presumption of manufacture of clinker - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - Clinker - It is not for the respondent to ...

Burden of Proof on Revenue: No Evidence of Clinker Manufacturing, No Duty Imposed Due to Limestone Shortage Presumptions.

October 5, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund of duty paid in Cash - manufacturing of cement - different rates when manufactured using Clinker and using Limestone & Gypsum - exemption is required to be...

Levy of penalty - Bill of Entry for clearance of ‘Sweet Pearl P200’ classified under 29054900 - Revenue reclassified the goods under 21069060 - The burden of proof was...

Clandestine manufacture and removal - plastic molded chairs - burden of proof to establish that there was clandestine manufacture - seizure of the pen drive -...

Refund of export duty paid in excess - conclusive evidence to discharge the burden of unjust enrichment - The CESTAT observed that the contract between the buyer and...

Undervaluation of goods - Mutuality of interest - interconnected undertaking - Burden of proof - Mere allegation that there was mutuality of interest remained unproved...

Duty & Penalty for clandestine manufacture and removal of goods - it is well settled legal position that the allegation of manufacture and clandestine removal of goods...

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

Smuggling - Burden of proof - Confiscation of Silver Jewellery, Silver Boondi & Indian Currency - The Tribunal's decision emphasized the lack of evidence and failure to...

The appellant challenged the demand of customs duty and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine clearance of short found goods from their factory...

CENVAT Credit - common inputs/input services used for manufacture of stock transferred exempted goods (lime stone) and dutiable products (Cement/Clinker) - The Tribunal...

CESTAT dismissed an appeal concerning refund claims for excess Countervailing Duty (CVD) on mobile phone imports. The tribunal upheld rejection on three grounds:...

Benami transactions - offence under Benami Act - onus of proving a benami transaction - after amendment, the onus of proving a benami transaction rests entirely on the...

Addition u/s 68 - burden of proof - share application money - The High Court, upon reviewing the submissions and evidence, concurred with the ITAT's findings. It...

Seizure - Burden of proof - ‘reasonable belief’ - Onus for proving the goods to be not smuggled - Seizure outside the ‘customs area’ - The Tribunal noted that the burden...

Demand of duty on Sulphur - There are no merit in the Revenue’s arguments that benefit of Notification No. 12/2012-CE can be denied on the ground that during manufacture...

Quick Updates: