Levy of penalty on Director, managing director and general ...

Central Excise

March 7, 2022

Levy of penalty on Director, managing director and general manager u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - There are no merits in the impugned order imposing penalties on the appellants who were performing their duties within the company - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty on Director, managing director and general ...

Central Excise

March 7, 2022

You may also like:

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Officer in default – whether when the company had a managing director, whole-time director and manager there cannot be any prosecution against the petitioner who was an...

Appointment of managing director, whole-time director or manager - Section 196 of the Companies Act, 2013 - Amendments came into force w.e.f. 12.9.2018

Penalty under Rule 26 and u/s 11AC - Personal penalty on Director, transporter and other persons - Clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods - levy of penalty...

Levy of penalty under Rule 25 cannot be imposed upon the main appellant for goods not manufactured by him - however penalty on director under Rule 26 confirmed - AT

Levy of penalty - the penalty under Section 26 is inextricably linked to the confiscation of goods as long as there is no confiscation of the goods ordered that there...

Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

Union is not exempted from the levy of indirect tax under Article 285 of the Constitution - General Manager, Western Railway can safely be termed as a dealer - HC

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

Levy of personal penalty on the Manager Director of the company - there are no merits in submissions that penalty under Rule 26 could not have been imposed upon the...

Quick Updates: