Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2022 Year 2022 This

Revision u/s 263 - the Ld. CIT(E) has taken into consideration ...


CIT(E) Revises Assessment u/s 263 Due to Inadequate AO Enquiry, Overlooking Assessee's Response and Tax Principles.

May 3, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - the Ld. CIT(E) has taken into consideration the incorrect and irrelevant facts to allege that there is no enquiry by the AO and thus the impugned assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue without considering the reply of the assessee to show cause notice u/s. 263 of the Act and keeping aside the basic principles of tax jurisprudence relevant for assessing income of a charitable trust. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

  3. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  4. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - lack of inquiry v/s inadequate inquiry - apparently from the records and as per the observations of the Ld. PR. CIT, coupled with the failure...

  5. Distinction between "lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry" emphasized. Assessee underwent rigorous assessment proceedings with multiple notices and replies. AO...

  6. CIT allowed to invoke Section 263 to revise assessment order due to AO's failure to verify assessee's explanation regarding investment in mutual funds/shares despite...

  7. The assessment order was passed without verifying the allowability of the cost of improvement as per Section 55(1)(b)(2), rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to...

  8. Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO failed to make necessary enquiries to ascertain the actual strength of the company, investment profile of...

  9. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  10. Revision u/s 263 - As the assessment was completed after making required amount of enquiry and there was no lake of enquiry or investigation by the AO on the issues...

  11. Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

  12. Revision u/s 263 - The Pr. CIT while passing the order u/s 263 cannot remand the matter back to the AO for passing the fresh order as it will lead to the conclusion that...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - the AO also mentioned in the order that “The Documents as submitted by the assessee were examined and placed on record”, however no remark on the...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - For the purpose of exercising jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act, the conclusion that the order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates