Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2022 Year 2022 This

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Thus this Court is of the view ...


Court Finds New Evidence of Share Price Manipulation by Mahanivesh Ltd; No Writ Jurisdiction Interference Needed.

May 28, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Thus this Court is of the view that despite lapse of four years and a scrutiny assessment, there is fresh tangible material in the present case in the form of information of beneficiaries of bogus LTCL/STCL report prepared by the office of Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) which reveals that Mahanivesh (India) Ltd. is a penny stock whose share price was manipulated in trade by way of a complex web of pre-arranged or artificial transactions to book long term/short term capital gain/loss to the beneficiaries. - this Court is of the view that the matter requires no interference in writ jurisdiction - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct relevant inquiries regarding the shares held as penny stocks by the assessee in GCM Securities Ltd. The Principal...

  2. The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

  3. Capital gain on sale of shares - market price or agreed price - transfer of shares by obtaining interest free loans for a long tenure coupled with call option agreements...

  4. The case involved a dispute over the writ jurisdiction of the High Court post privatization of (AIL) by a private corporate entity. - Erstwhile Public sector undertaking...

  5. Demand of GST - The High court noted that the return of documents raised a disputed question of fact, which could not be decided in the writ jurisdiction without further...

  6. High Court rejected petitioner's writ petition challenging refund rejection order, observing that respondent authority had passed reasoned order after considering...

  7. The reopening of assessment proceedings u/s 147 was valid as the Assessing Officer (AO) had received information about the assessee booking tax loss through trade in...

  8. The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition seeking a writ of prohibition despite the petitioner not challenging the allegedly erroneous orders. The...

  9. The Delhi High Court considered the validity of an arbitral award and the jurisdiction of the Facilitation Council u/s 18 of the MSME Act. The key issue was the...

  10. This case deals with the levy of deficit stamp duty and penalty in a court-conducted auction sale. The key points are: In a court-supervised auction sale, the stamp...

  11. The High Court considered the issue of reopening assessment u/s 148A based on a difference between allotment price and market price of shares. It was held that as no...

  12. Genuineness of sale price of shares - transfer of same share at different price - a much higher price in the hands of Empee Sugars & Chemicals Ltd., was undoubtedly to...

  13. Addition u/s 56(2)(viia) - purchase of shares at price more than its fair market value - The tribunal extensively reviewed the submissions and evidence presented,...

  14. Manipulation of share price - guilty of violating provisions of Section 12A (a), (b), (c) of the SEBI Act - The securities market deals with the wealth of investors. Any...

  15. The addition made u/s 68 for bogus share application money receipts was solely based on the statement of an unrelated third party, Shri Pravin Kumar Jain, recorded...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates