Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2022 Year 2022 This

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The AO ought to have, therefore, ...


CIT Orders Reassessment u/s 263 Due to AO's Non-Verification of Agricultural Income Claims Exempt u/s 10.

September 27, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The AO ought to have, therefore, exceeded his ambit to verify the veracity of the claims as to agricultural income, exempt u/s. 10, i.e., besides being in explanation of the source of the cash deposit. He having not done so, by seeking the approval of his range head, as enjoined upon him by the Board Circular, binding on him, the said authority was competent to, in exercise of his revisionary jurisdiction, require the AO to examine the same, setting aside the assessment for the purpose. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CIT invoked revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 alleging AO did not examine provision for subcontracting expenses and refund claim during reassessment proceedings. Assessee...

  2. The assessee claimed exemption from long-term capital gains tax on the sale of agricultural land situated beyond the prescribed distance from municipal limits. The...

  3. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  4. Issue of reassessment u/s 263, where the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) upheld the reassessment as erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest for verification...

  5. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  6. u/s 263, the AO had not made any addition regarding cash deposits in the assessee company's bank account and unsecured loan received during the year under consideration,...

  7. The assessee, a university, claimed exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) for the relevant assessment year, which was accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO) after considering the...

  8. Appealable order before CIT(A) - scope of order passed on the basis of direction given u/s 263, revisionary proceedings - Therefore, for all purposes, the computation of...

  9. Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO had wrongly allowed the assessee exemption of capital gains claimed u/s 54B - Tribunal found that neither any inquiry was made by the AO...

  10. Revision u/s 263 - The Pr. CIT while passing the order u/s 263 cannot remand the matter back to the AO for passing the fresh order as it will lead to the conclusion that...

  11. Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

  12. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  13. The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - CIT observed that, AO had accepted the assessee's claim without making any verification with respect to the various expenses claimed against the...

  15. ITAT set aside the Pr. CIT's revisional order under s.263, restoring the AO's reassessment order under s.147 r.w.s.144B. The Tribunal determined that the AO had arrived...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates