Reassessment of tax - the order of assessment, was not in ...

Reassessment Invalid: No Original Assessment Order Existed u/s 22(1) of 2005 Act; Officer Lacked Jurisdiction.

October 1, 2022

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Reassessment of tax - the order of assessment, was not in existence on the date of issuing notice for reassessment under Section 22 (1) of the Act of 2005. Therefore, the Assessing Officer was jurisdiction-less to initiate reassessment proceedings under Section 22 (1) of the Act of 2005 and the order of reassessment ultimately passed is without jurisdiction and without authority of law - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reassessment of tax - the order of assessment, was not in ...

Reassessment Invalid: No Original Assessment Order Existed u/s 22(1) of 2005 Act; Officer Lacked Jurisdiction.

October 1, 2022

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of order of reassessment - in order to invoke jurisdiction u/s 22(1) of the VAT Act or to initiate proceedings for reassessment there must be an order of...

ITAT held that where documents seized during a search pertain to a third party, the mandatory procedure is to proceed under Section 153C, not Section 147. The AO's...

The HC upheld the Appellate Tribunal's decision that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid. Although Explanation 1 to Section 147 states that mere production of...

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Reassessment notices issued u/s 148 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21 were time-barred by limitation. Withdrawal of approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) by the...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3). It was held that initiation of Section 153C occurs upon receiving...

SEBI issued an amendment to the Master Circular for Foreign Portfolio Investors, increasing the threshold for additional disclosure requirements from INR 25,000 crore to...

SC held that failure to inform arrestee of grounds for arrest in comprehensible language violates fundamental rights under Articles 22(1) and 21 of Constitution....

The High Court held that for a valid reassessment notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, the Revenue must comply with Section 151A, which mandates the issuance of such...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

Provisional attachment - jurisdiction to pass the provisional attachment order - A cumulative reading of the provisions of Section 83(1) read with Section 122(1-A) of...

Quick Updates: