Commission of offence u/s 276B r.w.s 278B - The petitioner ...

Court Quashes Order Against Petitioner: No Evidence of Involvement u/ss 276B, 278B, 409, and 34.

May 1, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Commission of offence u/s 276B r.w.s 278B - The petitioner neither falls within the definition of “Assessee”, “Principal Officer” nor an “Employee”. He was also not part and parcel of the management of HEC. The complaint also does not specify any overt act against the petitioner nor it has a single sentence to the effect that the petitioner is responsible for any of the acts which can attract any penal consequences nor it mentions that he was responsible for the daily affairs of the company - there is no material to summon the petitioner in the instant case by the Court below - order taking cognizance passed u/s 276B r.w.s 278B of Income Tax Act and Sections 409, 34 of IPC is quashed and set aside - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Commission of offence u/s 276B r.w.s 278B - The petitioner ...

Court Quashes Order Against Petitioner: No Evidence of Involvement u/ss 276B, 278B, 409, and 34.

May 1, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Inadvertent error by bank officials ignoring restraint orders led to FIR against bank officials for offences under IPC provisions. Continuation of criminal proceedings...

The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings and cognizance orders against the petitioners for offenses u/ss 276B and 278B of the Income Tax Act. The TDS amount in...

In the context of an appeal u/s 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act, the Court held that while the Appellate Court has the power to remand the matter to the Section 34...

Prosecution Proceedings - Offence u/s 276B and 278B - not depositing the TDS amount - The court acknowledged that the petitioners provided reasonable explanations for...

The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

SC overturned Division Bench's interference with arbitral award concerning contract interpretation between NHAI and contractor regarding geogrid quantities. Court held...

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

Refund claim rejected solely on non-compliance of time limit u/s 34(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Appellant authority noted facts, grounds, submissions...

The court examined whether the suit is barred u/s 34 of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner, being a shareholder, lacks locus standi to challenge the secured creditor's...

Scope of arbitral award - The principle of interpretation of contracts adopted by the Division Bench of the High Court that when two constructions are possible, then...

The High Court addressed various issues in a challenge to a final arbitration award u/s 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute involved deductions...

Rejection of application for condonation of delay in preferring the application u/s 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act - No application for setting aside the...

Section 276B criminalizes failure to deduct tax at source (TDS) as required under Chapter XVII-B or pay tax u/s 115-O or second proviso to Section 194B. The accused made...

Validity of Arbitration Award - amicable settlement between the parties - A harmonious reading of Section 31, 34(1), 34(2A) and 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

Jurisdiction - power to adjudicate SCN - The High Court rejected the contention that the previous involvement of a Commissioner of Customs in the case's proceedings...

Quick Updates: