Revision u/s 263 - the expectations of the Revisional ...

Income Tax

May 16, 2023

Revision u/s 263 - the expectations of the Revisional Commissioner are purportedly not met - One cannot possibly say that the AO had sleepwalked on the issues involved. Noticeably, the Pr.CIT himself has not entered into any minimal inquiry on the issues himself, if so considered expedient and there is not even prima facie demonstration of fallacy in the action of the AO which rendered the order erroneous and which also simultaneously caused prejudice to the revenue. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - the expectations of the Revisional ...

Income Tax

May 16, 2023

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - The provisions of Section 263 although appears to be of a very wide amplitude and more particularly after insertion of Explanation 2 but cannot...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - reopening on the basis of letter written by JCIT - In the case in hand the Ld. Revisional Authority has done no homework on its end but merely...

Revision u/s 263 - the issue was duly considered by Ld. AO after considering assessee’s detailed submissions. The view could not be said to be unsustainable view and it...

Revision u/s 263 - Once the valuation report has not been sent by the valuation officer to the assessing officer/assessee, within the period stipulated by the act that...

Appraisal report available but AO ignored, a fit case for revision u/s 263 - HC

Initiation of revisional proceedings - GVAT - Tribunal has materially erred in considering the legality and validity of the initiation of revisional proceedings, taking...

Revision u/s 263 - expenditure on purchased CDs on Jain Religion - AO had carried out detailed enquiries and taken a plausible view and accepted the assessee's treatment...

Revision u/s 263 - Deduction u/s 80IC - Since, AO had not expressed any view in that behalf as is discernible from the assessment order, revision order sustained.

Revision u/s 263 - AO while completing the assessment u/s 143(3) never applied his mind to various issues as pointed out by the CIT - revision upheld - AT

Revision u/s 263 - case of “no enquiry” - Regarding introduction of Explanation 2 to section 263, as claimed by Ld. PCIT in his order, we only need to submit that the...

Quick Updates: