Revision u/s 263 - The assessment order is very cryptic without ...

Assessment Order Lacking Detailed Verification by AO Deemed Inadequate; Revision Order Upheld by PCIT.

November 25, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - The assessment order is very cryptic without speaking about the verifications made by the AO for which the return filed by the assessee was selected for “Scrutiny” - PCIT has correctly observed that no proper examination/verification was done by the AO - Revision order sustained - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - The assessment order is very cryptic without ...

Assessment Order Lacking Detailed Verification by AO Deemed Inadequate; Revision Order Upheld by PCIT.

November 25, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3)...

The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO's assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. The unsigned assessment...

Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

Distinction between "lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry" emphasized. Assessee underwent rigorous assessment proceedings with multiple notices and replies. AO...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the validity of a Limited scrutiny Assessment. The PCIT observed that the AO did not...

Revision u/s 263 - revision based on the audit objection - borrowed satisfaction - The ITAT noted that the AO had called for details and evidence from the appellant and...

The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

Revision u/s 263 - another possible view of the matter - The appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the PCIT, arguing that the original assessment order by the AO was...

The ITAT quashed the reopening of assessment under section 147, finding it invalid on two grounds. First, the reasons recorded by the AO were vague and incomplete,...

The assessee borrowed loans from financial institutions at an interest rate of 12.75% and advanced loans to group companies or relatives at 12% interest rate. The...

Reversal of Input Tax Credit - proper verification of the transactions of selling/purchasing dealers to ensure that there is a match of the details of the transaction or...

PCIT's view that section 36 allows deduction only for bad and doubtful debts, not for provision on standard assets, was challenged. AR presented case laws allowing...

The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct relevant inquiries regarding the shares held as penny stocks by the assessee in GCM Securities Ltd. The Principal...

Validity of an ex-parte revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: The PCIT passed...

Quick Updates: