Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - debatable issue - Since the ...

Income Tax

November 25, 2023

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - debatable issue - Since the assessee-respondent had not suppressed the amount in question and had disclosed it in its return, merely because he declared it under a particular “head of income”, and the AO chose to treat the same under some other head, the assessee-respondent cannot be accused of furnishing incorrect particulars of income or suppressing facts. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - debatable issue - Since the ...

Income Tax

November 25, 2023

You may also like:

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - Nature of interest income - capital receipt or revenue receipt - This being a highly debatable issue and once there is a debate as assessee’s...

Penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) - When interest income itself is not disclosed, there is no question of holding that all the facts relating to the interest income and material to...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

Penalty u/sec. 271(1)(c) - income disclosed in search action - Ex-parte order - The Tribunal observed that the assessee admitted to suppressed receipts, which were...

Deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Issues on basis of which ALP shown by the assessee has been rejected are debatable - No penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition on account of Transfer Pricing adjustment relating to payment of commission - it is evident that these are debatable issues - In any...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Unexplained Expenditure on Stamp Duty and Registration Charges made out of Undisclosed Income - There was no dishonest intent of the assessee...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - the entire addition itself becomes debatable one. It is well settled proposition of law that the penalty u/s 271(1)(c)...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - assessee in its balance sheet has disclosed loan from a sister concern, Therefore, it cannot be said that the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee did not comply with the notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act requiring the assessee to furnish certain information - Neither the AO nor...

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

Quick Updates: