Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Once evidence is produced by ...

Refund Claim and Unjust Enrichment: Burden of Proof Shifts to Department if Respondent Proves Duty Payment.

April 9, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Once evidence is produced by the respondent that they have borne the incidence of duty whose refund is claimed by them, the burden would shift to the department to prove that the respondent’s claim is not correct. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Once evidence is produced by ...

Refund Claim and Unjust Enrichment: Burden of Proof Shifts to Department if Respondent Proves Duty Payment.

April 9, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund of Customs duty - unjust enrichment - Chennai Port Trust (the buyer) had indeed borne the duty burden, as evidenced by financial records and a letter from the...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

CESTAT dismissed an appeal concerning refund claims for excess Countervailing Duty (CVD) on mobile phone imports. The tribunal upheld rejection on three grounds:...

The appellant agreed that duty paid by mistake to the government was passed on to the principal contractor under protest. Their argument was that the principal...

Refund of export duty paid in excess - conclusive evidence to discharge the burden of unjust enrichment - The CESTAT observed that the contract between the buyer and...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

CESTAT ruled that in provisional assessment cases, adjustments of excess duty payments against shortfalls must be handled comprehensively. The tribunal determined that...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - except for putting forth arguments theoretically, the appellants have not put forth any incontrovertible evidence to prove that the...

CESTAT allowed refund of customs duty paid twice through customs broker for same import consignment. Appellant demonstrated through Bill of Entry, payment challans, and...

Quick Updates: