Oppression and Mismanagement - The Appellants are Shareholders ...

Shareholders' Inclusion Crucial for Fair Resolution in Company Oppression and Mismanagement Case.

December 28, 2023

Case Laws Companies Law AT

Oppression and Mismanagement - The Appellants are Shareholders of the Respondent No. 1 Company and are family members of the other Shareholders. They are concerned with the affairs of the Company and their arraignment as party to the proceedings would facilitate an effective, efficacious, just and fair adjudication of the case. It is held that they are proper and necessary party and their impleadment will assist in arriving at the correct decision pending with NCLT. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and Mismanagement - The Appellants are Shareholders ...

Shareholders' Inclusion Crucial for Fair Resolution in Company Oppression and Mismanagement Case.

December 28, 2023

Case Laws Companies Law AT

You may also like:

Oppression and Mismanagement - minority shareholders - There was no alternative except liquidation or revival of company through other modes including sale of assets to...

The NCLAT held that disputes related to shareholder oppression or mismanagement under the Companies Act are distinct from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of the Petitioner from the Directorship - the instant Company Petition is maintainable U/s.241 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the...

Reduction of share capital - Even though the public shareholders/non promotor shareholders had objected to the reduction of share capital in the EGH but the majority...

Oppression and mismanagement - misappropriation of funds - as such no irregularities were found in convening an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting which was requisitioned at...

The crux of the matter revolves around allegations of oppression, mismanagement, illegal sale of company land, allotment of equity shares, appointment and removal of...

Oppression and mismanagement - appellant has no inherent right to continue as Managing Director/Director in the 1st respondent unless he is able to carry the majority...

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

Oppression and mismanagement - Determination of minimum shareholding for filing complain / petition against the company - The ‘onus’, to establish ‘Membership’ is on the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Issue of Right Shares - subsequent Rights Issue during the pendency of 1st Rights Issue - gross under-subscription of the rights issue -...

NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the NCLT's discretionary waiver of eligibility criteria under Section 244(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal considered...

Oppression and Mismanagement - once the Company against which the aforesaid application has been filed by the appellant on the allegation that there is mismanagement in...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Winding up order - The Company was non-functional, it had already given its premises on rent and it was the only income of the Company. Therefore, we find that the...

Quick Updates: