Recall of an order - The Appellant was well aware that case was ...

Hearing Date Notification Upheld; Appellant's Attendance Discrepancy Doesn't Affect Authority's Decision.

January 6, 2024

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

Recall of an order - The Appellant was well aware that case was listed for hearing on 12.05.2023 and he entered appearance through Counsel, who inspite of entering his attendance in chat box, is not shown to be present. The relevant fact to be noticed is that the Appellant was well aware of the date 12.05.2023. - The Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in rejecting IA No.3216 of 2023. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Recall of an order - The Appellant was well aware that case was ...

Hearing Date Notification Upheld; Appellant's Attendance Discrepancy Doesn't Affect Authority's Decision.

January 6, 2024

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

You may also like:

The audit wing of the State GST Authority directed to keep in abeyance all proceedings related to discrepancy note no. 3, including the show cause notice dated...

Estimation of net profit - rejection of books of accounts - Once the books of account of the assessee was produced before the lower authorities and if there is certain...

Detention order quashed due to non-supply of crucial documents relied upon by detaining authority, violating detenu's right to make effective representation under...

All the decisions were actually brought to the notice of the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority has chosen to disregard them on the ground that the...

Disciplinary proceedings against the Chartered Accountant (CA) - The person who is adversely affected wants to know as to why his submissions have not been accepted - An...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

Section 161 allows an affected person to apply for rectification of an order. The authority had previously passed an order and decided no rectification was necessary,...

Jurisdiction - power to adjudicate SCN - The High Court rejected the contention that the previous involvement of a Commissioner of Customs in the case's proceedings...

Prayer for direction for placing the Settlement Proposal submitted by the Appellant before the CoC for consideration - CoC unanimously decided to reject the proposal...

Validity of policy decision - Imposing prohibition on export of Shark fins of all species of Shark - The rationality of the decision cannot be adjudged on a proof of...

Private bonded warehouse - discrepancy in stock register - customs authorities and the Police Department of the State opposing each other in a petition instituted by the...

HC quashed orders imposing tax and penalty under section 130 of GST Act arising from stock discrepancies discovered during business premises survey. Following...

The High Court held that the respondent-authority had jurisdiction u/s 61 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 to issue a second show-cause notice seeking...

Exemption from GST - pure services or supply of goods to the Notified Area Authority, Vapi - Notified Area Authority, Vapi is a “local authority” or “governmental...

Quick Updates: