Refund of excise duty paid under protest against demand created ...

Revenue Fails to Prove Tobacco Manufacturing; Tribunal Upholds Excise Duty Refund for Appellant.

March 1, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Refund of excise duty paid under protest against demand created on alleged manufacture and clearance of Zarda Scented Tobacco - The High court concludes that the revenue failed to establish the manufacture of 'Zarda Scented Tobacco' or the passing on of the disputed duty liability. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision to allow the appellant's appeal and grant a refund of excise duty is upheld. The petition of the revenue lacks merits and is dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of excise duty paid under protest against demand created ...

Revenue Fails to Prove Tobacco Manufacturing; Tribunal Upholds Excise Duty Refund for Appellant.

March 1, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Levy of excise duty and NCCD under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - It is pertinent to note that in the writ petition, there are no pleadings that action of levy of excise...

Refund of Excise Duty in cash - What the assessee suggests is that the Cenvat credit given for acquisition of capital goods to a manufacturer, who is otherwise exempted...

Goods manufactured within Special Economic Zone (SEZ) were challenged regarding applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) and Additional Duty of Excise...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - excess duty paid under the provision of Chewing Tobacco & Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and...

CESTAT allowed appeal regarding refund of erroneously paid excise duty on imported SKO. Appellant substantiated claim through PLA records, TR-6 challans, invoices, and...

Allowability of excise duty refund u/s 80IB - There is an inextricable link between the manufacturing activity, the payment of central excise duty and its refund -...

Short payment of Central Excise Duty - The Appellate Tribunal concluded that central excise duty is leviable only on excisable goods manufactured or produced in India,...

Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

CESTAT appellate tribunal adjudicated a dispute concerning tobacco product classification, determining that the appellant intentionally misclassified goods as Chewing...

ITAT determined that excise duty refund received under Notification No.39/2001 Central Excise, issued as part of earthquake relief incentive scheme for Kutch District,...

Levy of excise duty or NCCD - Post GST era - The CGST itself contemplates levy of excise duty upon tobacco and tobacco products apart from they being taxed under the...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Duty refund claimed based on affidavit and certificate was inappropriate. Revenue did not dispute discharge of duty by appellant on revised invoice. Appellant...

The CESTAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant seeking refund of central excise duty u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's claim for refund on...

Admittedly, excise duty is leviable on goods manufactured and if there is no manufacturing activity involved, as held by the lower authorities, for the purpose of...

Quick Updates: