In the ITAT Jaipur case, the issue revolved around a revision ...

Tribunal Quashes CIT's Revision Order, Upholds AO's Salary Payment Assessment as Properly Inquired and Verified.

May 21, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

In the ITAT Jaipur case, the issue revolved around a revision u/s 263 by CIT concerning the assessee's case under limited scrutiny u/s 143(3). The primary focus was on payments to specified persons and a percentage disallowance on salary payments. The tribunal held that the AO had conducted inquiries and verified details submitted by the assessee, allowing the salary payments. The observations by the PCIT were based on a different assessment year, and a disallowance in one year cannot be the basis for doubting claims in another year. The tribunal concluded that the revision proceedings by the PCIT were beyond jurisdiction and against legal principles, quashing the order u/s 263 and allowing the assessee's appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

In the ITAT Jaipur case, the issue revolved around a revision ...

Tribunal Quashes CIT's Revision Order, Upholds AO's Salary Payment Assessment as Properly Inquired and Verified.

May 21, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The same issue was again sought to be inquired into by the PCIT/CIT/ revisional authority which could not be allowed to be inquired multiple...

Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal against revision under section 263. Regarding bonus payment of Rs. 2.02 crores, the Tribunal found that the AO had...

Exemption u/s 11 - salary payments to the specified persons u/s 13(3) - As the salary had been paid to the specified persons against the services provided by them the...

Reassessment u/s 147 - difference in salary payment - Reasons recorded by the AO are based on incorrect facts in addition to the fact that the AO has scrutinised the...

TDS u/s 194H or 192 - addition u/s 40(a)(ia) - Non-deduction of TDS on payment of commission to directors - appellant considered payment as salary and deducted TDS u/s...

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - Assessee has discharged the onus on it; and twice the AO enquired about it and in the reassessment this issue has been thoroughly...

Assessee failed to declare Long Term Capital Loss (LTCL) on sale of shares of ECL and Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of shares of Saya in the return of income....

Addition u/s 40A(2)(b) - Allegation of excessive and unreasonable salary paid to the relative of partner - The assessing officer questioned the legitimacy of this...

Disallowance of salary and interest paid to the partners - it is not a case where the assessment is made by the AO u/s.144 of the Act. It is a case where assessment...

Assessment of trust - Addition on account of excessive salary to Chairman of the society within the meaning of section 13(3) and in violation of section 13(2)(c) -...

The assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IC for the finished products manufactured at Unit No. III at Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, was initially allowed but later...

Disallowance u/s. 40(A)(2)(b) - excessive salary payment - payment to close associates / related parties - AO can disallow only that portion of the total expenditure,...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessment orders issued u/s 153C for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 were beyond the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer...

Quick Updates: