Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that refund claim of Special Additional ...


Refund claim of Special Additional Duty allowed. Test of unjust enrichment Passed. Original and appellate authorities' findings upheld.

Case Laws     Customs

June 3, 2024

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) was justified as unjust enrichment was not established. The importer provided invoices, VAT Challan, and CA Certificate to support the claim. Original and Appellate Authorities both found no fault in the claim. The principle of not challenging factual findings unless proven perverse was emphasized. Citing a Supreme Court case, the appeal by the revenue was dismissed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

  2. Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

  3. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Appellant has claimed the deduction of the amount claimed as refund by them as expense in his profit and loss account, i.e. as a...

  4. Refund claim alongwith interest - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - As from the facts itself, it is clear that the appellants were not required to pay any...

  5. Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order of original authority rejecting the refund claim on the ground of unjust...

  6. Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

  7. The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

  8. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

  9. Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - Imported goods as ''wireless telephone'' - The Tribunal's findings indicated that the appellant had paid duty without...

  10. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

  11. Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

  12. The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

  13. Refund of SAD - denial of refund on the ground that the test of unjust enrichment not passed on - non-collection of excess duty paid by the appellant - The certificate...

  14. Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - price inclusive of duty of excise - maintaining uniformity of price - duty paid under protest - refund allowed - HC

  15. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - value of the software is includable in the assessable value of hardware or not - The duty and the value are shown in the face of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates