Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different ...

Jurisdiction challenge rejected for non-participation. 10% deposit within 8 weeks for fresh hearing. File replies in 12 weeks. Final order in 2 months.

August 6, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different officer from investigating officer. Petitioner negligent in non-participation in proceedings emanating from notices. Opportunity given subject to 10% disputed tax deposit within 8 weeks. Impugned quashed orders treated as addendum to notices. Petitioner to file separate replies within 12 weeks. Final orders on merits to be passed within 2 months thereafter. Petition disposed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different ...

Jurisdiction challenge rejected for non-participation. 10% deposit within 8 weeks for fresh hearing. File replies in 12 weeks. Final order in 2 months.

August 6, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The petitioners challenged the attachment of their bank account and steps taken by the respondents pursuant to an order of rectification, alleging irregular recovery...

The HC directed Axis Bank, Bhayander Branch to transfer the entire amount in the petitioner's account to the Registrar within two weeks. The Registrar must transfer...

Impugned proceedings challenged for exceeding scope of show cause notice, non-consideration of submissions during investigation and payments made, gross non-application...

The High Court considered a challenge to an order u/s WBGST Act due to a 32-day delay in filing an appeal and non-deposit of pre-deposit. The petitioner provided...

Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

Petitioner challenged the impugned order on grounds of violation of principles of natural justice, asserting unawareness of proceedings. Court observed petitioner's...

Maintainability of appeal - appeal rejected as being defective for non-payment of the pre-deposit - the appeals filed by the instant petitioners u/s 107 of the CGST/BGST...

HC granted interim stay on appellate GST demand order for two weeks, considering absence of constituted Appellate Tribunal and prima facie case established by petitioner....

HC granted interim stay on appellate order demanding GST dues for two weeks, conditional upon petitioner paying 10% of disputed tax balance beyond Section 107(6)...

Challenge to assessment order and rectification order for assessment year 2018-19 - mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-2B - order challenged on grounds of...

The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

Appeal rejected on limitation grounds but petitioners' explanation ignored; appellate authority directed to note explanation per HC precedent, condone delay, hear appeal...

HC found merit in petitioner's challenge regarding violation of natural justice principles and non-application of mind in the impugned orders. Court directed petitioner...

CIRP process - security deposit and/or intercorporate deposit - Whether this ‘Security Deposit’ and the interest thereon would fall within the ambit of the definition of...

HC set aside the impugned assessment order due to improper service of show cause notices through GST portal instead of tender or RPAD, violating natural justice...

Quick Updates: