Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The issue pertains to the validity of reopening proceedings ...


Reopening Tax Cases Against Deceased Invalid: Notice Must Be Addressed Correctly, Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee.

November 19, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The issue pertains to the validity of reopening proceedings against a deceased assessee. It was held that the issuance of a notice u/s 148 of the Act is the foundation for reopening an assessment, and the sine qua non for acquiring jurisdiction is that such notice should be issued in the name of the correct person. Issuing a notice to a deceased person is not merely a procedural defect but a condition precedent for the notice's validity. The defect cannot be cured u/s 292BB, as this provision applies when the assessee is aware of the proceedings but takes advantage of defective notices. In cases where the initiation itself is against a deceased person, Section 292BB cannot be invoked. The decision was in favor of the assessee, and the matter was decided by the Appellate Tribunal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The HC ruled that a GST demand against a deceased individual without issuing a show cause notice to their legal representative is invalid. While Section 93 of the GST...

  2. Service of notice u/s 148 of Income Tax - no service effected on address as per PAN - dept was aware of address in bank - by virtue of the further proviso to sub-rule...

  3. ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment dispute regarding the validity of notice u/s 143(2). The tribunal found that the notice was issued to an incorrect/non-existing...

  4. ITAT ruled that notice under section 143(2) issued in the name of deceased assessee Smt. S was invalid, despite participation of legal heirs in assessment proceedings....

  5. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  6. Validity of notice - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In the present case, there is an in advertent error in the notice issued by the AO reflecting only the PAN column...

  7. ITAT adjudicated a case involving reopening of assessment under section 147, addressing two primary legal issues. First, regarding notice issuance post-1-04-2021, the...

  8. HC held that Section 93 addresses tax liability post-death but does not authorize determination against a deceased person. Issuance of show cause notice (SCN) and demand...

  9. Impugned notice u/s 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act quashed. HC held that issuing notice u/s 148 to a deceased assessee instead of legal heir u/s 159(2)(b) is invalid and...

  10. Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

  11. The case pertains to the refund of service tax paid on input services utilized for the export of 'Cut and Polished Diamonds' during October 2015 to March 2016, as per...

  12. Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the...

  13. Jurisdiction powers to issue Reopening notice in metro city - It was established that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued by an Income Tax Officer (ITO),...

  14. The CESTAT ruled that the amount paid by the appellant towards advertisement and promotion of its own franchise outlets cannot be included in the value of taxable...

  15. The case discusses the validity of proceedings against the legal representatives of a deceased assessee when reopening notices in the name of the assessee have expired....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates