Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

The ITAT quashed the order of the Pr. CIT, holding that the ...


Tribunal Overturns Tax Addition on Joint Development Agreement; Rules in Favor of Assessee Over Unjustified Valuation.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT quashed the order of the Pr. CIT, holding that the addition u/s 56(2)(x) on differential between stamp duty valuation and purchase price was not justified. The ITAT observed that the AO had enquired and was satisfied with the assessee's contention regarding the Joint Development Agreement (JDA). The ITAT noted that taxable income u/s 45(5A) would arise only upon obtaining a completion certificate, which was not the case here. The ITAT found that the Pr. CIT's order was based on assumptions without backing of facts, contrary to the prudent businessman principle. Consequently, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  2. Disallowance of payment paid to the landlord towards the land expenses - Tribunal has merely relied upon certain clauses of the Joint Development Agreement which was...

  3. Classification of services - Business Support Services or not - Joint venture - co-developer or agent - if strictly go through the above agreement, it is nowhere...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of Long Term Capital Gains arising from a joint development agreement. The question was whether the capital gain tax should be...

  5. Capital gain - Joint Development agreement (JDA) - Transfer / sale of land u/s 2(47)(v) or not? - - the said execution of land development agreement cannot be a sale of...

  6. The case involved a dispute over the tax rate applicable on Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) from the sale of unlisted shares u/s 112(1)(c) of the Act. The Appellate...

  7. Service tax demand with interest and penalty on reimbursement cost received from landowner for constructing flats under Joint Development Agreement set aside....

  8. CIRP - The Kolkata Municipal Corporation who is owner of the premises by Development Agreement gave right of development of the premises to the Respondent No.1 and...

  9. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

  10. Addition in assessment u/s 153C - Addition u/s 69 - addition on basis of loose papers on which name of the appellant was mentioned along with some other parties - The...

  11. Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

  12. Rollback of an Advance Pricing Agreement - Income-tax (Third Amendment) Rules, 2015 - CBDT issues Notification

  13. development and construction of residential flats - joint development agreement - benefit of Section 80IB(10) in proportion to the share to which they are entitled to...

  14. Construction of residential complexes - joint land development agreement - agreement prior to 19-4-2006 - value of flats given to land owners - inclusion of Registration...

  15. Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates