The ITAT held that the CIT(A) erred by not recognizing the ...

Depreciation Error Corrected: Tax Audit Report Figure of Rs. 89,96,72,987 Prevails Over ITR Amount

April 3, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held that the CIT(A) erred by not recognizing the correct depreciation figure of Rs. 89,96,72,987/- as per the Tax Audit Report, instead of the incorrectly stated Rs. 1,03,13,420/- in the ITR. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order on the depreciation issue. Regarding the bonus payment under section 43B, the ITAT found that CIT(A) failed to address this issue properly and remanded it back with directions to pass a speaking order according to law. The CIT(A) should have verified that the bonus was paid before the due date of filing the income tax return. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that the CIT(A) erred by not recognizing the ...

Depreciation Error Corrected: Tax Audit Report Figure of Rs. 89,96,72,987 Prevails Over ITR Amount

April 3, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Transitioning unutilized input tax credit under the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - error in claiming input tax credit of unadjusted TDS. The High Court held...

Penalty levied u/s 271B - tax audit report - In our view, strained relationship with the earlier CA would constitute reasonable cause. The tax authorities have pointed...

CBDT extends due date for filing Income Tax Returns and Tax Audit Reports

Tribunal found assessee had reasonable cause for delay in furnishing Tax Audit Report due to delay in finalization of statutory audit arising from dispute between Board...

Entitlement for relief u/s 89(1) - Can be equated to refund amount or not - Employee under suspension from 01.03.1996 to 16.04.2007 got ‘subsistence allowance’ for the...

ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute regarding a revised tax audit report addressing a typographical error. The tribunal found that the CPC/AO violated principles of natural...

Penalty u/s 271B - assessee had failed to get his account audited u/s 44AB - The assessee explained that the delay in furnishing the Audit Report was due to the death of...

Petitioner paid Rs. 8,46,84,821/- under Settlement Scheme for 2010-2011, against which Respondents recovered Rs. 19,16,74,501/-, resulting in excess collection of Rs....

100% EOU wrongly claimed refund u/r 96 instead of Rule 89 of CGST Rules, 2017 on IGST paid on inputs/capital goods utilized for exports. HC held EOU entitled to...

Levy penalty u/s. 271B - not filing tax audit report within the due date specified under the Act - When audit report was obtained within due date, merely for delay in...

Penalty u/s. 271B - delay in obtaining Tax Audit Report - Being a public sector unit, the assessee company after completion of statutory audit under Companies Act is...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271B - default in furnishing of Tax Audit Report - In section 271B of the Act, the only requirement is to get the accounts of assessee audited or...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the notice issued u/s 65 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for conducting an audit for the...

This case pertains to the validity of an order passed u/s 250 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the disallowance of expenditure due to a...

Quick Updates: