ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the Assessing ...

Tax Exemption Claim Remanded: Tribunal Orders Comprehensive Review of Expenses and Supporting Documentation Under Section 10(23C)

May 13, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to re-examine the disallowance of expenses under Section 57(iii). The tribunal found that documentary evidence supporting the exemption claim under Section 10(23C) was potentially overlooked. The matter was remanded for fresh proceedings, with instructions to comprehensively verify the assessee's documents and evidence regarding salary grants and related expenditure. Ground Nos. 1 to 5 were allowed for statistical purposes, effectively providing the assessee an opportunity to substantiate its claims through a detailed re-evaluation of the original assessment.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the Assessing ...

Tax Exemption Claim Remanded: Tribunal Orders Comprehensive Review of Expenses and Supporting Documentation Under Section 10(23C)

May 13, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT allowed the appeal, setting aside both AO and CIT(A) orders due to procedural irregularities. The appellate authority failed to adjudicate issues on merits as...

ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, affirming the assessee's method of net accounting for reimbursement expenses. The tribunal found the assessee consistently followed a...

HC examined proceedings under Section 73 of UP GST Act regarding disputed input tax credit claims. The authority initially rejected certificates filed per Government...

HC held that the Tribunal erroneously remanded the matter for fresh assessment despite having recorded findings favorable to the revisionist and dismissing the revenue's...

HC held that the tax authority improperly issued a show-cause notice demanding reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) without considering the petitioner's prior voluntary...

ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute concerning expense allocation and deduction claims under Section 80IC. The tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for...

CESTAT examined service tax liability for electricity transmission/distribution services. Court held subcontractors must pay service tax independently even if main...

ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the AO to verify whether the assessee claimed asset acquisition costs as "application of income"...

Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

Validity of assessment passed w/o intimating u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 11 and Claim of Expenses by the CPC - The Appellate Tribunal noted that the return of...

The NCLAT set aside the adjudicating authority's mechanical admission of a Section 95 application, finding a lack of independent assessment. The tribunal emphasized that...

The assessing officer (AO) exceeded jurisdiction by reclassifying income as fees for technical services (FTS) instead of royalty, contrary to the limited remand order...

HC invalidated the tax order under BGST Act, 2017 and IGST Act, 2017 regarding input tax credit claims. The court found the assessing authority failed to properly...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's claims in multiple tax-related matters. Regarding Section 80G, the Tribunal upheld the deduction for Corporate Social Responsibility...

Quick Updates: