HC allowed petitioner's application under Section 119(2)(b), ...

Taxpayer Wins Relief: One-Day Delay Condoned for Income Tax Return Filing Under Section 119(2)(b)

May 19, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

HC allowed petitioner's application under Section 119(2)(b), condoning one-day delay in ITR filing for AY 2016-17. The court found genuine hardship in electronic filing process, noting petitioner had already uploaded critical documents and commenced return submission. Recognizing statutory authorities' duty to provide relief in meritorious cases, the HC directed relaxation of strict timelines, emphasizing that technical impediments should not prejudice taxpayers' substantive compliance obligations.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC allowed petitioner's application under Section 119(2)(b), ...

Taxpayer Wins Relief: One-Day Delay Condoned for Income Tax Return Filing Under Section 119(2)(b)

May 19, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

HC condoned the delay in filing GST returns beyond the 30-day period specified in Section 62(2) of the GST Act, 2017, following the precedent established in Comfort Shoe...

HC allowed the petition challenging the denial of deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The court found that the tax authority erroneously rejected the society's...

The petitioner sought condonation of delay in filing the return of income, asserting that the audit report was received only in December 2019, after the due date for...

The HC condoned the delay of 799 days by the petitioner in filing Form 9A u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act. Despite the delay being bona fide, the Assessing Officer...

Condonation of Delay in filing the returns of income seeking refund - delay due to date of ruling of the AAR - genuine hardship - The delay in filing tax returns for AYs...

Condonation of delay of one day in filing the income tax return - Power of Principal Commissioner/the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax to condone the delay in...

The case involved a petitioner seeking relief under Article 227 of the Constitution regarding the rejection of their application for condonation of delay in claiming a...

The HC held that the 60-day limitation period under Section 62(2) of the GST Act is directory rather than mandatory. Where a registered person fails to file returns...

The High Court rejected the application for condonation of delay u/s 119 (2) (b) in filing income tax returns u/s 139 (1) or 139 (4) for AY 2022-23. The petitioner's...

The HC ruled that the 60-day limitation period under Section 62(2) of the GST Act for filing returns after a best judgment assessment is directory rather than mandatory....

Condonation of delay - inordinate delay of 508 days - “sufficient cause” - In case the delay is not condoned, it would amount to legalise an illegal and unconstitutional...

Condonation of delay in filing returns - due to ill-health, returns (GSTR-3B) could not be filed within the time prescribed by the second respondent - The petitioner,...

New Personal Income Tax Regime heralds significant relief, especially for Middle Class Taxpayers

Registration u/s 12A - Rejection of petitioner's application u/s 119(2)(b) for delay in filing audit report in Form-10B. Held that petitioners are entitled to succeed....

Refund of tax - Applications to condone delay in filing the return of income and claim of refund u/s 119(2)(b) rejected - The petitioner came to know about the fact of...

Quick Updates: