🌿 NEEM CASE: A DEFEAT THAT TAUGHT A LESSON
Let’s go deeper into the Neem vs. Haldi cases to understand their legal, cultural, political, and scientific significance, and what they meant for India’s intellectual property (IP) policy and traditional knowledge (TK) defense.
📌 The Patent Details:
- Patent Number: EP0436257 (European Patent)
- Granted to: W.R. Grace & Co. and the U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Claim: A method for controlling fungi on plants using an extract from Neem seeds.
⚖️ Legal Battle:
- Challenged by: A coalition of Indian NGOs, including the Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology (led by Vandana Shiva), and the European Parliament.
- Argument: Neem’s pesticidal properties are part of Indian traditional knowledge; the patent lacked novelty.
⏳ Timeline:
- 1995: Patent challenged
- 2000: EPO revokes the patent after a 5-year battle
❌ Why India "Lost":
- No prior structured database to prove traditional use in patent-compliant formats
- High legal costs and time burden on India
- Western patent systems were not designed to accommodate oral or community knowledge
🧡 HALDI CASE: A TURNING POINT
📌 The Patent Details:
- Patent Number: US Patent No. 5,401,504
- Granted to: University of Mississippi Medical Center
- Claim: Use of turmeric powder for wound healing.
⚖️ Legal Battle:
- Challenged by: CSIR (Council of Scientific & Industrial Research), India
- Evidence Provided:
- Ayurvedic texts
- Ancient Sanskrit documents
- Scientific publications in Indian journals
⏳ Timeline:
- 1995: Patent granted
- 1996: CSIR files objection
- 1997: USPTO revokes the patent — just two years later!
✅ Why India "Won":
- CSIR provided documented prior art
- The strategy was legal and scientific, not just political
- India had started moving toward a systematic approach to protecting traditional knowledge
🇮🇳 IMPACT ON INDIAN POLICY
📚 Creation of the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL):
- Launched: 2001 by CSIR and Ministry of AYUSH
- Content: Over 300,000 formulations from Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani, and Yoga
- Languages: Translated into patent-office-friendly languages (English, French, German, Japanese, Spanish)
- Access: Made available to 12 major international patent offices
🧠 What TKDL Does:
- Stops wrongful patenting of Indian TK
- Allows pre-grant opposition based on traditional knowledge
- Empowers India diplomatically and scientifically
🌍 Broader Global Context
🔒 Biopiracy Awareness:
- India became a global advocate against biopiracy.
- Pushed for traditional knowledge protection in forums like:
- WTO (TRIPS Agreement)
- WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization)
🏛️ Legal Reforms in India:
- Amended Patents Act, 1970 (in 2002, 2005) to:
- Prevent patents on traditional knowledge
- Introduce stricter definitions of novelty and inventive step
🔁 Key Takeaways
|
Aspect
|
Neem Case
|
Haldi Case
|
|
Outcome
|
Patent revoked after 5 years
|
Patent revoked within 2 years
|
|
Legal Grounds
|
Traditional knowledge, but lacked formal documentation
|
Strong documentation and prior art
|
|
Impact
|
Showed India's vulnerability
|
Showed India's capacity to defend its TK
|
|
Legacy
|
Prompted creation of TKDL
|
Validated TKDL-style approach
|
|
Symbolism
|
Loss of a national asset
|
Victory for cultural pride
|
9911796707
