Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2025 Year 2025 This

CESTAT adjudicated a case involving alleged clandestine removal ...


Unverified Digital Evidence Fails to Substantiate Sponge Iron Removal Allegations, Revenue Claim Dismissed

May 20, 2025

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

CESTAT adjudicated a case involving alleged clandestine removal of sponge iron, where revenue authorities relied primarily on unverified pendrive evidence without substantive corroborative documentation. The tribunal critically examined the evidentiary basis and found insufficient substantiation for the claims. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the confirmed demand of Rs.1,47,93,916/- along with associated interest and penalties. The key legal determination centered on the inadequacy of evidence, specifically highlighting the lack of comprehensive investigative procedures, absence of verifiable input-output analysis, and reliance on unattributed digital records. The appellate order comprehensively rejected the revenue's case due to evidentiary insufficiency and procedural non-compliance.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine Removal - clandestine removal is a serious charge and requires to be substantiated by evidence encompassing various activities in the chain of events. - The...

  2. Clandestine removal of sponge iron - once the statements of the transporters and commission agent are ignored, there is nothing much left to sustain the allegation...

  3. Clandestine removal - The standard of evidences need not be as high as in criminal proceedings, where the charges are required to be established beyond reasonable doubts....

  4. Clandestine removal and under valuation - private records - presumption - The Revenue has miserably failed to produce corroboration evidence on records so as to...

  5. CESTAT allowed the appeal against allegations of clandestine production and removal of sponge iron. Revenue's case relied solely on theoretical input-output ratios...

  6. Clandestine removal - data on pen drive and statements recorded during investigation - The department has miserably failed to substantiate the allegation of clandestine...

  7. Clandestine manufacture and clearance of Sponge Iron alleged - undervaluation demand calculated based on seized documents - retraction of statements - Section 9D of...

  8. Clandestine removal - The allegation has been raised on the basis of hypothetical and illogical input-output ratio of iron ore to pig iron

  9. Clandestine Removal - mild steel ingots from sponge iron - pig iron - There is no explanation forthcoming in the impugned orders for discarding of the energy consumption...

  10. Clandestine removal - excess usage of raw material Sponge Iron, than mentioned - the entire demand is based on mere average yield of production and no concrete evidence...

  11. The ITAT invalidated digital evidence seized during a search operation, specifically a pendrive, as inadmissible under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. The...

  12. CESTAT allowed the appeal, finding the excise duty demand legally unsustainable. The tribunal determined that the revenue's case was built solely on input-output ratio...

  13. The CESTAT set aside the demand and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine removal, holding that the charge was not substantiated by sufficient evidence....

  14. Clandestine removal - evasion of duty - clearance of branded Khaini - burden to prove on Revenue - Ultimately, the High court concurred with the majority view of the...

  15. CENVAT credit - all these insurance policies which have been taken by appellant are connected with the activity of the appellant i.e. manufacturing of Hot Iron and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates