Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (2) TMI 448 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......e, the benefit of the above said SSI exemption Notification could not be denied to the appellants by simply alleging that they had used the brand name of another person without proving the same. 4. emsp Consequently the impugned order is set aside. The appeal of the appellants is allowed with consequential relief, if any, permissible under the law.
|