Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (4) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (4) TMI 378 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......one the delay. 2. emsp Nobody is present on behalf of the Respondent. After hearing the learned JDR, I do not find any merits in the above contention of the respondent inasmuch as the condonation of delay cannot be considered to be an error on the face of the records requiring any rectification. Accordingly, ROM is rejected. (Dictated in the Court)
|