Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (2) TMI 564 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......as been recovered from the customers. Hence, the claim is hit by the doctrine of unjust enrichment and the appellants are not entitled to the refund on this count also. 8. emsp The impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) is sustainable. The same is upheld. The appeal filed by the appellants is rejected. (Pronounced in court on 3-2-2009)
|