9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Registration of a partnership firm under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Analysis: The case involved a dispute regarding the registration of a partnership firm under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The application for registration was filed with the Income-tax Officer, who noted discrepancies in the partnership deed. The original partnership had three members, but a new partnership was formed with additional partners without the consent of a retiring partner. The Income-tax Officer refused registration due to the rectification deed being executed beyond the accounting period. The applicant appealed to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), who upheld the Income-tax Officer's decision, stating that the defect in the original partnership deed remained unresolved. Subsequently, the applicant appealed to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, which also denied registration, citing a previous High Court decision. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel argued that the rectification deed could rectify the mistake within the prescribed time under sections 184 and 185 of the Income-tax Act. The Revenue's special counsel contended that the Tribunal's decision was justified based on a precedent where a partnership deed involving a minor as a full partner was deemed void ab initio. The court, after considering the arguments, found that the Tribunal erred in rejecting the registration without thoroughly examining the genuineness of the mistake and the acceptability of the explanation provided by the assessee. The court opined that if the mistake was genuine and the explanation satisfactory, registration should be granted. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, remanding the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh consideration based on the court's observations.
|
