Pricing Login

Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice : Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp

9911796707

Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form so we can address them promptly.

Follow us:

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1988 (12) TMI HC This

Login
Referred In
Summary

Forgot password

New Registrations:
Now Available at TaxTMI.Com

1988 (12) TMI 17 - HC - Income Tax

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that relief under section 80-I should be allowed after allowing development rebate under section 33. The decision was based on the Supreme Court ruling in Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1978] 113 ITR 84.

← Previous Next →

Quick Updates:

What's New:
Latest Case Laws

What's New:
Latest Notifications

What's New:
Latest Circulars

F: GST practitioner debates whether Gujarat High Court GSTR-3B interest r...

F: Windmill expenses qualify for proportionate Input Tax Credit under Rul...

F: Second-hand truck dealers can pay GST on profit margin under Rule 32(5...

F: Consolidated GST notices spanning multiple years face legal challenges...

F: Business owner with Rajasthan GST registration faces conflicting advic...

H: Clause 445 imposes strict penalties on non-profits diverting income to...

H: Clause 444 imposes strict penalties for false accounting entries to pr...

H: Clause 441 imposes INR 25,000 penalty for failure to maintain tax reco...

H: Clause 443 updates penalty rules for undisclosed income with a 10% tax...

H: Clause 442 imposes penalties for inaccurate or missing documentation i...

H: Clause 441 imposes fixed INR 25,000 penalty for failure to maintain bo...

H: Clause 440 of Income Tax Bill 2025 sets immunity rules for timely tax ...

H: Clause 439 Income Tax Bill 2025 sets formula-based penalties for under...

H: Identical Mineral Lists in Income Tax Act 1961 and 2025 Bill Support T...

H: Income Tax Bill 2025's Schedule-XIII updates exclusions on luxury and ...

H: Parliamentary Committee Reviews Income Tax Bill 2025 Simplifying Tax C...

F: Firm faces GST reversal demand after cement supplier's insolvency desp...

H: Auto-Populated Inter-State Supply Data in GSTR-3B Table 3.2 deferred. ...

H: Central Government Notifies 2.70-Hectare SEZ for IT/ITES Under SEZ Act...

H: Cancellation of GST Registration for Non-Filing Returns Valid Under Se...

H: HC refuses to quash show cause notice under Section 74 CGST Act, allow...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Schedule-XI modernizes provident fund regulations...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Schedule-XIV preserves existing insurance taxatio...

T: Government gets 3-year power under Clause 535 to resolve Income Tax Bi...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 536 repeals 1961 Act with comprehensive tr...

A: ITC can be cross-utilized across unrelated business supplies without r...

A: CGST Section 50(1) Advisory on Interest Payment Valid as Preliminary N...

A: School bus operator must pay GST when parents pay directly instead of ...

A: Legal Metrology Rules 2011 mandate labeling requirements for packaged ...

A: Directors and managers face personal liability under Section 49 for co...