Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2013 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (11) TMI 1113 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
- Waiver of predeposit of duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis:
The Applicant filed an Application seeking waiver of predeposit of duty of Rs.6,93,809/- and an equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Applicant had sent steel plates to their job worker for conversion into kiln shell with tyres and coolers as per Rule 4(5)(a) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The waste and scrap generated during this process were claimed to have been used by the Applicant in their factory for manufacturing base frames and other capital goods. The Applicant recorded the receipt and consumption of the waste and scrap in their internal private records. The Revenue contended that the waste and scrap were not properly accounted for in the statutory records, suggesting possible removal without payment of duty. However, the Tribunal found that the Applicant had indeed recorded the receipt and utilization of the waste and scrap in their private records. The Tribunal noted that the Revenue had accepted private records in the absence of statutory records for raw material consumption. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the Applicant had made a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit as the allegation of non-accountal in statutory records did not imply clandestine removal without duty payment. Therefore, the Tribunal waived the predeposit of dues adjudged and stayed the recovery during the pendency of the Appeal.

This judgment primarily dealt with the issue of waiver of predeposit of duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Applicant had sent materials to a job worker and received waste and scrap in return, which they claimed to have used in their manufacturing process. The Revenue alleged that the waste and scrap had not been properly accounted for in the statutory records, implying possible removal without payment of duty. However, the Tribunal found that the Applicant had recorded the receipt and utilization of the waste and scrap in their private records, which were accepted by the Revenue in the absence of statutory records. The Tribunal concluded that the Applicant had established a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit as the discrepancy in statutory records did not prove clandestine removal without duty payment. Therefore, the Tribunal granted the waiver and stayed the recovery of dues during the Appeal process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates