Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2020 (1) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (1) TMI 1373 - HC - Indian LawsDishonor of Cheque - insufficient consideration shown in the sale deed - It was specific case of respondent no.2 that cheques were not issued for any legally enforceable debt - HELD THAT:- The applicants - original complainant are required to establish that cheques were issued towards remaining payment of sale consideration. The learned Appeal Court in para 12 and 13 has specifically found and observed that sale deed was silent as to issuance of any cheques on the date of execution of sale deed and /or any payment remaining on the date of execution and registration of sale deed in favour of respondent no.2. So in Court's considered opinion, the applicants - original complainants were required to establish that cheques obtained by them were towards legally enforceable debt and in absence of any debt, the cheques obtained or in possession of original complainant would not lead the Court to believe that there is any debt outstanding against respondent no.2. In order to attract penal provision for bouncing of cheques contained in Chapter XVII of the Act, it is essential that dishonour of cheques should have been issued in discharge, wholly or in part of any debt or liability of the drawer to the payee. Strict liability under section 138 of the Act can be enforced only when cheques is issued in discharge of any legally enforceable debt or any other liability. There is no legal obligation on the part of the private respondent to effect clearance of cheques, if it is not issued towards legally enforceable debt or any other liability. Section 139 of the Act merely raises presumption in favour of holder of cheque that same has been issued for discharge of any debt or liability. Existence of legally recoverable debt is not a matter of presumption under section 139 of the Act - In the case on hand, there was no debt or any liability on the part of the private respondent to be discharged as same has been proved by private respondent by submitting sale deed at Exh.49 and Exh.51 before the learned Trial Court, inter-alia, showing that there is no liability on the part of the private respondent to discharge at the time of execution of sale deed, since full consideration was paid to respective applicants herein. Thus, learned Appellate Court rightly found that private respondent discharged burden to prove that cheque in question was not issued for legally enforceable debt or any other liability, in light of sale deed executed and registered by the applicants themselves before the office of Sub Registrar. There are no substance in the present Revision Applications as there is no illegality or impropriety committed by the learned Appellate Court - revision application dismissed.
|