9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Claim for deduction of expenses incurred on a motor car for the assessment year 1979-80. Analysis: The only issue raised in this appeal was regarding the claim for deduction of Rs. 4,200 representing expenses incurred on a motor car. The assessee, a partner in several firms, argued that the amount should be allowed as a business expenditure to earn a share of profit from the firms. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) rejected the claim citing reasons such as the firms maintaining their own cars, lack of evidence of partnership agreement clauses, and the belief that the Ludhiana firm should claim the expenditure. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) also questioned the expenditure without doubting its genuineness. However, the Appellate Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities' reasoning, emphasizing that the expenditure was genuine and necessary for the business. They referred to a Supreme Court case to support the principle that a partner can claim deductions for expenses incurred to earn income from the partnership firm. The Appellate Tribunal criticized the lower authorities for not focusing on whether the expenditure was genuinely incurred to earn income from the firm. They highlighted that the ITO and CIT(A) had misdirected themselves by questioning the necessity of the expenditure and suggesting that the Ludhiana firm should claim it instead. The Tribunal emphasized that the crucial aspect is whether the expenditure was incurred to earn income, not how the assessee chose to manage their business affairs. They cited a Supreme Court judgment to support the right of a partner to claim deductions for expenses incurred in earning a share of profit from the firm. Ultimately, the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the deduction of Rs. 4,200 spent on maintaining and running the car, enabling him to earn a share of profit from the partnership firm. In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and granting the deduction for the expenses incurred on the motor car. The judgment highlighted the principle that a partner can claim deductions for expenses genuinely incurred to earn income from a partnership firm, irrespective of how the expenditure was managed within the firm.
|
