Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1999 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1999 (3) TMI 280 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......y the respondents. 2. emsp We have gone through the records. We have also heard ld. JDR Shri V.M. Udhoji, for the appellant Revenue. We do not agree with the contention of the Revenue that broken poles are marketable as PPC poles. We therefore, do not find any substance in the Revenue rsquo s appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal of the Revenue.
|