Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2001 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2001 (9) TMI 329 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......e in September or October but the imports made in July. Further, there is no indication as to when the contract for those imports was entered into. We, therefore, hold that Revenue has not succeeded in showing that the price shown in the invoices does not reflect the true sale price. We, therefore, set aside the impugned Order and allow the appeal.
|