Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Article Section

Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST CA Akash Phophalia Experts This

Valuation – Concept of Pure Agent Defined

Submit New Article
Valuation – Concept of Pure Agent Defined
CA Akash Phophalia By: CA Akash Phophalia
January 17, 2019
All Articles by: CA Akash Phophalia       View Profile
  • Contents

Introduction

Revenue laws are often called as incomplete without valuation. Tax is always charged on some basic value and guiding principles to calculate such value is enumerated in the concerned law itself. In fact come times courts had held inapplicability of taxation in case where valuation is failed. In this article the author aims to discuss includibility of expenses incurred during the course of provision of services in the value of services under GST law in the light of a recent AAR ruling held by West Bengal in the case of Premier Vigilance and Security Pvt Ltd  2018 (11) TMI 337 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL

Legal Provisions

The valuation principles are enumerated in Section 15 of the CGST Act 2017. The governing provision of Section 15 is further preceded by the rules stated at Rule 28 to Rule 35 in CGST Rules 2017. According to the principle provision stated in Section 15 supra, the cost of goods and services incurred in providing outward supply shall form part of the value of the outward supply. However, rule 33 of CGST Rules provides an exception as-

Rule 33.Value of supply of services in case of pure agent.-Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of this Chapter, the expenditure or costs incurred by a supplier as a pure agent of the recipient of supply shall be excluded from the value of supply, if all the following conditions are satisfied, namely,-

  1. the supplier acts as a pure agent of the recipient of the supply, when he makes the payment to the third party on authorisation by such recipient;
  2. the payment made by the pure agent on behalf of the recipient of supply has been separately indicated in the invoice issued by the pure agent to the recipient of service; and
  3. the supplies procured by the pure agent from the third party as a pure agent of the recipient of supply are in addition to the services he supplies on his own account.

Explanation - For the purposes of this rule, the expression ―pure agent‖ means a person who-

(a) enters into a contractual agreement with the recipient of supply to act as his pure agent to incur expenditure or costs in the course of supply of goods or services or both;

(b) neither intends to hold nor holds any title to the goods or services or both so procured or supplied as pure agent of the recipient of supply;

(c) does not use for his own interest such goods or services so procured; and

(d) receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such goods or services in addition to the amount received for supply he provides on his own account.”

Illustration.  Corporate services firm A is engaged to handle the legal work pertaining to the incorporation of Company B. Other than its service fees, A also recovers from B, registration fee and approval fee for the name of the company paid to the Registrar of Companies. The fees charged by the Registrar of Companies for the registration and approval of the name are compulsorily levied on B. A is merely acting as a pure agent in the payment of those fees. Therefore, A’s recovery of such expenses is a disbursement and not part of the value of supply made by A to B.

Facts and findings

In the case referred above the applicant company has paid toll charges while providing security services to banks for transportation of cash/ coins/ bullion in specially built vehicles or customized cash vans. The company claimed such toll charges as reimbursement from the bank being they claimed to act as pure agent of banks while making payment of such toll charges.

While going through the agreement it was inferred that the toll and parking charges will be paid on the actual amount. But the banks do not specifically authorize the company as a ‘pure agent’ or acknowledgement payments of toll charges as their own liability.

The company further admitted in the application that it owed the vehicles and the toll is charged for providing the services by way of access to a road or bridge. The company being the owner of the vehicles was the recipient of the services provisioned on payment of toll, which was compulsorily levied on the vehicles. The expenses so incurred were, therefore, cost of the services provided to the banks reimbursement of such cost was no disbursement, but merely the recovery of a portion of the value of supply made to banks.

Conclusion

In view of the legal provisions cited and the facts mentioned above it was held that the company was not acting  in the capacity of a ‘pure agent ‘of the bank while paying toll charges were cost incurred, so that his vehicles can access roads/bridges to provided security services to the recipients.

Toll charges paid are not, therefore to be excluded from the value of supply Rule 33. GST shall, therefore be payable at the applicable rate on the entire value of the supply including toll charges paid.

Comments

The above ruling is an important one for valuation of supply as it is going to have its far reaching impacts on the other such kind of services being used in the course of provision of outward supply. Another point to note is that the above ruling is not the new concept being enumerated by the judiciary but is the concept prevailing since service tax laws in force. However, in the era of GST this can be best claimed as “Old wine in new bottle.”

-----

CA Akash Phophalia

ca.akashphophalia@gmail.com

9799569294

 

By: CA Akash Phophalia - January 17, 2019

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates