Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1991 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1991 (4) TMI 124 - HC - Income Tax

Issues involved:
1. Computation of capital for deduction u/s 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961
2. Disallowance of expenses incurred for advertisement in souvenirs
3. Disallowance of depreciation on a property

Computation of capital for deduction u/s 80J:
The High Court of Bombay, in a reference related to the assessment year 1972-73, addressed the question of whether the assessee could include loans from banks and unsecured borrowings in the computation of capital for deduction u/s 80J. The court, considering the decision in Lohia Machines Ltd. v. Union of India, ruled in favor of the Revenue, answering the question in the negative.

Disallowance of expenses for advertisement in souvenirs:
The court allowed the assessee to raise additional questions, one of which pertained to the disallowance of a sum for advertisement expenses in souvenirs. Referring to a circular by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the court noted that no distinction should be made between different types of advertisements. As the circular is binding on Income-tax authorities u/s 119 of the Income-tax Act, the court answered this additional question in favor of the assessee.

Disallowance of depreciation on a property:
Regarding the claim for depreciation on a property, the court considered a previous judgment and concluded that if an expenditure or allowance was allowable under other sections of the Income-tax Act, it could not be denied based on prohibitory provisions in another section. Therefore, the court held that the assessee was entitled to depreciation on the property, answering the second additional question in favor of the assessee.

No costs were awarded in this judgment.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates