9911796707
TMI Blog1976 (4) TMI 119X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was Rs. 18,425. The appellant's wife derived dividend income of Rs. 9,666. It is not disputed that the wife's dividend income has to be clubbed with her husband's income under s. 64(iii). Before the ITO it was contended that before clubbing, 80-L relief is to be given to the dividend income derived by the wife. The ITO negatived the contention by holding that the dividend income of the wife shoul ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... held that the income from the house property could be included in the assessee's total income and the measure of income to be so included would be subject to the first proviso to s. 9(2) of the IT Act, 1922. That proviso prescribes that where property is in the occupation of the owner for purpose of his own residence, the annual value thereof shall first be determined in the same manner as if the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Committee's report has been plugged by introduction of s. 27(1) of the IT Act, 1961. Sec 27(1) creates a fiction that the spouse transferring house property without adequate consideration is deemed to be the owner of the property and the income from such property should be computed treating the transferor as the owner of the property. The result of this fictino is that when the husband transfers ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... therefore, the owner of the shares transferred. Therefore, we have to determine the dividend income of the wife under the provisions of the IT Act by taking her as the owner of the shares. Sec. 80-L provides a mode of computation for determining the dividend income from shares by allowing a deduction upto Rs. 3,000. So, what the law determines as the dividend income of the wife is after allowing t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
