9911796707
TMI Blog1988 (4) TMI 262X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... learned counsel for the parties, we direct special leave to be granted. 2. The two appellants applied to the Deputy Commissioner concerned in Bangalore, under the Provisions of Karnataka Land Revenue Act for permission to convert certain separate areas of their agricultural lands into non-agricultural use.The applications were rejected but the Appellate Tribunal granted the applications by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... judgment beginning from paragraph 9 till the end appears to have been dictated on the 25th March, 1987. As the contents of paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 would show the judgment of 9th March, 1987 though dictated in the open court had not been signed on account of delay in transcription and the Court chose to continue the same proceeding on the basis of the information gathered by it while disposing of s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... judgment of the subsequent date commenced. 4. This Court had occasion sometime back to deal with a case of this type to some extent in Vinod Kumar Singh v. Banaras Hindu University [1988 (1) SCC 80] where in open Court a judgment had been pronounced by dictation to the shorthand writer and the Court chose not to sign it and the matter was relisted and disposed of by delivering a contrary jud ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y should have been given to the parties to meet the same. Before us the learned counsel for the appellants wanted to rely upon some documents which would support their stand that the High Court was not right on merit. We have not considered it appropriate to go into the merit of the matter because in our opinion that would not be appropriate. On the other hand, the appeal should go back to the Hig ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
