Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1991 (3) TMI 257

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... an alleged less charge demand under Section 28 of the Customs Act on the ground that the seals made of ceramic are classifiable under Chapter 69 and not under Chapter 84 of the CTA 1975. Therefore, the benefit of Notification under 117/78 would not be available since Chapter 69 is not mentioned in the First Schedule to the said Notification 117/78. Both the lower authorities have found against the appellants and hence this appeal before the Tribunal. 2. The learned Consultant, Shri K. V. Kunhikrishnan, appearing for the appellants has urged that it is not denied that the ceramic seals are component parts to be used in the manufacture of water pumps assembly, which is exported outside the country. They were allowed to import these compone .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... they are parts of the engines mentioned under Heading No. 84.06. The contention of the Customs authorities that the article, which is provided under another heading other than Heading No. 84.06, will not get the exemption as provided in the Notification, is not readily understandable. When the Notification grants exemption to the parts of the engines, as mentioned under Heading No. 84.06, we find no reason to exclude any of such parts simply because it is included under another heading. The intention of the Notification is clear enough to provide that the parts of the engines, mentioned under Heading No. 84.06, will get the exemption under the Notification and in the absence of any provision to the contrary, we are unable to hold that the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 84.65 alone are eligible for the benefit of the said Notification. Mere grant of Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate or Advance Licence does not entitle the appellants to claim exemption where there is none in terms of the said Notification. Chapter Note 1(b) reads as follows : (I) This Chapter does not cover : (a) .......... (b) appliances and machinery (for example, pumps) and parts thereof, of ceramic material (Chapter 69); (c) .........." As regards the submission for benefit under Section 75 of the Customs Act, the learned Jr. Departmental Representative for the Revenue has stated that there was no such claim before the lower authorities and it is a matter of enquiry into facts whether the ceramic seals have been utilised .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d held that bushings which perform the function of bearings fell under Tariff Heading 84.63(2) and therefore, the benefit of the Notification 281-Cus., dated 2nd August, 1976 was denied to the appellants. Jain Engineering, in that case. There was no dispute on facts that the bushings imported therein were parts of internal combustion piston engines falling under Tariff Heading 84.06. It is, therefore, in the light of the peculiar wordings of paragraph 2 of column (2) of the Table to the Notification 281-Cus., dated 2nd August, 1976 that the Hon ble Supreme Court held that bushings were entitled to the benefit of the said Notification. It also observed that bushings could not be treated as bearings merely for the reason that bushings and bea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the appellants to the office of the JCCI E was retained in the said office. Copy of the DEEC has not been brought on record by the appellants which could substantiate their submission. In any case, as pointed out by the learned Departmental Representative for the Department, this is a new claim which was never before the lower authorities and it would, therefore, not be desirable for us to grant that benefit at this stage which requires enquiry into new facts. The appellants would, however, be at liberty to file their claim under Section 75 of the Customs Act before the concerned Customs authorities who may then decide their claim in accordance with law. 7. In the light of our findings on the main issue involved whether these ceramic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates