1985 (11) TMI 184

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... neet Ohri, SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : K.L. Rekhi, Member (T)]. The appellants had filed a conso- lidated apeal in time as per the practice prevalent till 1982. As there were three separate causes of action, they were asked to file two more appeals which they did. The first-mentioned two applications seek condonation of the delay involved in filing the two supplementary appeals. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e learned representative of the department had no submissions to make. 4. On careful consideration of the matter, we agree with the appellants. Following the ratio of our earlier order aforesaid, we allow these three appeals with consequential relief to them. 5. We wish to make it clear that the relief granted herein confined to the yarn captively used in the appellants factory for weaving. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X