1998 (8) TMI 298

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - Shri S.C. Jindal, the ld. Advocate arguing the Miscellaneous Application for condonation of delay, submits that Smt. Sushila Singh, the applicant in the present case was not well and was under the treatment of a Doctor. In support of his contention, he filed a Certificate from the Doctor. He submits that since she was unwell, she was not in a position to fi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ved on the applicant, but was served on the husband of the applicant. We find that the husband was looking after the day-to-day work and the address of the husband and wife who is the applicant in the present case was not different. Therefore, receiving of the adjudication order by the husband does not vitiate the process of receipt in view of the special circumstances indicated above. Looking to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X