1996 (10) TMI 334

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ondent. [Order per : V.P. Gulati, Vice President]. - The issue in the appeal relates to the benefit of Notification 43/88 in respect of the Phenyldiamine which the appellants received under the certificate in terms of Chapter X and utilized the goods in the manufacture of another notified pesticide intermediate under Notification No. 43/88 which in turn was cleared by the appellants to another .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... /s. Sandoz India Ltd. the manufacture of the pesticide. He has cited the judgement of the Tribunal in the context of the same notification where the issue involved was similar and reported in 1996 (86) 676 (Tribunal); C.C.E. v. United Phosporous. 2.  The ld. JDR adopted the reasoning of the ld. Lower authority. 3.  We have considered the pleas made by both sides. We observe that what h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . We take note of fact that the chemical received and the chemical manufactured by the appellants which is ultimately used in the manufacture of pesticide both are figuring under the notification. It can therefore be inferred the framers of the notification were aware of the use of the material through the route of another intermediate product. In view of the above and following ratio of the decis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X