2000 (1) TMI 525

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - This appeal has been filed against the order of Commissioner (Appeals), who has remanded the matter back for re-consideration and determination of the value of a product supplied to Railways termed as 'Data Acquisition and Processing Equipment for Modern Oscillograp Cars'. This product was supplied for the Railway wagons, by the appellant m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted, that one of the alleged items, whose value is to be loaded i.e. 'ruggedisation' is not any physical existing goods, but are only in nature of charges per set, therefore amounts on account of this alleged item, cannot be added, in any case, they being after removal charges at site. 3. The learned SDR Smt. Radha Arun, appearing for Revenue took us through para 6 of the Grounds of Appeal w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lant's own case would be applicable and binding in this case also. (b) As regards the eligibility of the deduction of the values of the 'bought out items' we find that there is no finding or determination of the lower authority regarding the nature of the 'bought out item'. In fact, as regards 'ruggedisation' the learned DR fairly conceded that this was not a physical goods, but only certain .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X